Needs for the content for the systematic work for the student. The part regarding the manager

Needs for the content for the systematic work for the student. The part regarding the manager

The requirements for assessing student research

1. The therapy associated with research. It is necessary that even if utilizing the systemic and integration approaches, it ought to be an operate in therapy, without an evident bias in management generally, marketing, pedagogy, legislation, philology, etc.

2. The amount of relevance and practical need for the investigation problems.

3. The amount of elaboration of theoretical product: overview of the literary works, comprehensively showing the developments of domestic and international researchers with this subject. Not just the literature referencing is welcomed, but in addition analysis, contrast and benchmarking different views of researchers, based on that the student formulates the writer’s place.

4. The connection between theoretical and material that is empirical. Relevance of the investigation susceptible to its content.

5. collection of diagnostic tools and research test.

6. The degree of research outcomes.

7. The degree of interpretation of research outcomes (level of analysis).

8. The amount of guidelines distributed by the pupil potential audience.

9. Quality of work’s design.

10. The amount of research’s independence. The analysis should really be carried out because of the pupil individually, with all the involvement of other individuals just as topics or professionals. Duplication and copying of studies carried out by other writers (plagiarism) is strictly forbidden. The current presence of components of separate systematic imagination, the formulation and reason of their very own way of solving the debatable dilemmas associated with concept and training of therapy, the separate nature of this presentation regarding the product as well as the formula of conclusions in line with the outcomes of the research are valued.

11. imaginative approach. You will find subjects which are studied in numerous combinations by pupils from year to year – they’re not valued. An interesting topic is respected, the choice of revolutionary practices, writer’s practices and just about every other manifestation of imagination.

Work can be considered unsatisfactory because of the after criteria.

1. scientific studies are perhaps maybe not mental.

2. The research subject doesn’t match its content.

3. The study had not been carried out or partially carried out. Its email address details are maybe perhaps perhaps not prepared or partially prepared. Its answers are prepared, yet not interpreted, or partially interpreted. The theoretical component will not match the empirical.

4. The text associated with the work will not meet with the demands associated with the design tradition: there is a large number of spelling errors, the writing is not modified, sloppy created.

5. The research is a complete or partial plagiarism. In the event that term paper is seen as unsatisfactory, it really is came back to your pupil for modification.

In the event that pupil would not pass the initial protection or even the commission discovered the task unsatisfactory, the student just isn’t permitted to protect and it is expelled through the university..

Obligations for the manager of term and last qualifying work

Relative to the theme regarding the term paper or FQW (final qualifying work) manager:

– provides the pupil an activity to organize for a term paper or even a thesis, assists the pupil when you look at the growth of a calendar working arrangements for your period of the FQW;

– advises towards the pupil the required fundamental literary works along with other sources in the theme;

– recommends the pupil from the selection of diagnostic tools and drawing up a policy for empirical research

– recommends the pupil in the company for the research

– advises the pupil in the processing and interpretation of empirical research outcomes

– checks the job in components so when a entire.

– For FQW writes review to the office and recommends the reviewer. The reviewer is planning a summary of the task.

Dates and time of consultations are appointed by the manager or the mind for the division. Attention! In the event that pupil failed to meet with the due dates set apart because of the dean’s office for term paper or FQW, the manager has got the right to not provide good advice.

Post a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.